Lijst van de geraadpleegde werken

• Abelson, R.A. (1981). The psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36(1), 715-729.

• Adorno, T. W. (1991). The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge.

• Agliata, D. & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2004). The Impact of Media Exposure on Males’ Body Image. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 7-22.

• Andersen, A.E. & DiDomenico, L. (1992). Diet vs. shape content of popular male and female magazines: A close-response relationship to the incidence of eating disorders? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11(3), 238-287.

• Archer, J. (1984). Gender roles as developmental pathways. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 245-256.

• Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behaviour. American psychologist, 51(9), 909-917.

• Badinter, E. (1992). XY: de l’identité masculine. Paris: Jacob.

• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.

• Bakewell, C. & Mitchell, V.-W. (2004). Male Consumer Decision-Making Styles. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 14(2), 223-240.

• Barcus, F.E. (1983). Images of life on children’s television : sex roles, minorities and families. New York: Praeger.

• Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

• Barson, D.C. (2004). From Grudginator to Experimenter. Create loyal male consumers through sampling. Global Cosmetics Industry, 1 maart 2004, 20-21.

• Bartsch, R.A., Burnett, T., Diller, T.R. & Rankin-Williams, E. (2000). Gender representation in television commercials: updating an update. Sex Roles, 43(9/10), 753-785.

• Battles, K. & Hilton-Morrow, W. (2002). Gay Characters in Conventional Spaces: Will and Grace and the Situation Comedy Genre. Critical studies in media communication, 19(1), 87-105.

• Beddeleem, J., Rohde, C.C., Zaczek, D., Borgers, A. & Grootaers, A. (2000). Meet the new man: verslag ‘new man symposium’. IP Press Brussels: De Vrije Pers.

• Belkaoui, A. & Belkaoui, J.M. (1976). A comparative analysis of the roles portrayed by women in print advertisements: 1958, 1970, 1972. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(2), 168-172.

• Bem, S.L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

• Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 42,  155-162.

• Betz, M., O’Connell, L. & Shepard, J.M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 321-324.

• Bhat, S., Leigh, W. & Wardlow, D.L. (1998). The effect of consumer prejudices on ad processing: heterosexual consumers’ responses to homosexual imagery in ads. Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 9-28.

• Biltereyst, D., Van Bauwel, S. (2005). Culturele mediastudies. Gent: Academia Press.

• Birenbaum, A. (1984). Toward a theory of role acquisition. Sociological theory, 2(1), 315-328.

• Blanchard-Fields, F., Suhrer-Roussel, L. & Hertzog, C. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Old questions, new answers. Sex Roles, 30, 423-457.

• Boni, F. (2002). Framing Media Masculinities. Men’s lifestyle magazines and the biopolitics of the male body. European Journal of Communication, 17(4), 465-478.

• Bowman, J. (2006). What drives men to shop? Media Asia, 6 februari 2006, 20-21.

• Brabant, S. & Mooney, L. (1986). Sex role stereotyping in the Sunday comics: Ten years later. Sex roles, 14(3/4), 141-148.

• Brehm, S.S., Kassin, S.M., Fein, S. & Mervielde, I. (1999). Sociale Psychologie. Gent: Academia Press.

• Brems, C. & Johnson, M.E. (1990). Reexamination of the Bem sex-role inventory: the interpersonal BSRI. Journal of personality assessment, 55(3&4), 484-498.

• Bresnahan, M.J., Inoue, Y., Liu, W.Y., Nishida, T. (2001). Changing gender roles in prime-time commercials in Malaysia, Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Sex Roles, 45(1/2), 117-131.

• Brewer, M.B., Dull, V. & Lui, L. (1981), Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 760-773.

• Bretl, Daniel J. and Joanne Cantor (1988), ‘The portrayal of Men and Women in US Television Commercials’: A recent content analysis and Trends over 15 years’, Sex Roles, 18 (9/10), 595-608.

• Briney, C. (2005). Men’s grooming products overview: Metrosexuals? Or just average guys… Presentation to In-Cosmetics 12 april 2005. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.incosmetics.com/files/incosmetics05_Euromonitor_%20Mens_Grooming_Market.pdf .

• Brody, L.R. (1996). Gender, emotional expression, and parent-child boundaries. In R.D. Kavanaugh, B. Zimmerberg & S. Fein (Eds.), Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp.139-170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

• Brouns, M., Verloo, M. & Grünell, M. (1995). Vrouwenstudies in de jaren negentig: een kennismaking vanuit verschillende disciplines. Bussum: Coutinho.

• Brumbaugh, A.M. (1993). Physical Attractiveness and Personality in Advertising: More than Just a Pretty face? Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 159-164.

• Buikema, R. & Smelik, A. (1993). Vrouwenstudies in de cultuurwetenschappen. Muiderberg: Coutinho.

• Bunting, M. (2001, 9 februari). Loadasex and shopping: a woman’s lot. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2005 op het World Wide Web: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,435624,00.html .

• Burton, S., Netemeyer, R.G. & Lichtenstein, D.R. (1994). Gender differences for appearance-related attitudes and behaviors: Implications for consumer welfare. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 14(1), 60-76.

• Buss, D. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.

• Buss, D. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: handbook of basic principles (pp. 3-38). New York: The Guilford Press.

• Buss, D. & Schmitt, D.P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological review, 100(2), 204-232.

• Butler, M. & Paisley, W. (1980). Women and the mass media: Sourcebook for research and action. New York: Human Sciences.

• Capon, N. & Burke, M. (1980). Individual, product class, and task related factors in consumer processing. Journal of consumer research, 7(3), 314-326.

• Chandler, D. (2006). Media Representation. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Modules/MC30820/represent.html .

• Chapman, R. (1998). The great pretender: variations on the New Man Theme. In: R. Chapman & J. Rutherford, Male order: unwrapping masculinity (p. 225-248). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

• Children & Media, Boys to men: Conference Final Report (september 1999). Media messages about masculinity. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://publications.childrennow.org/publications/media/boystomen_1999.cfm http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/10/db/54.pdf .

• Children Now (spring 2000). Images of men and boys in advertising, a report from Children Now. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.childrennow.org/media/medianow/mnspring2000.html.

• Choi, N. & Fuqua, D.R. (2003). The structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 872-887.

• Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. in P. Noller & M.A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31-52). Cleveton, England: Multilingual Matters.

• Claerhout, P. (11/12/2003). De zachte machoman is plotseling overal. De Tijd, 11/12/2003, p. 17.

• Clincke, L. (11/03/2006). Mannen & Beauty. Special Mannen, De Standaard Magazine, 14(10), p.45,47.

• Cliquet, R.L. (1999). Bronnen van biologische variabiliteit bij de mens. Gent: Academia Press.

• Club Industry (1 april 2002). Marketing Matters. The Men’s Market. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://fitnessbusiness-pro.com/mag/fitness_marketing_matters/ .

• Colarelli, S.M. & Dettmann, J.R. (2003), Intuitive evolutionary perspectives in marketing practices, Psychology & Marketing, 20(9): 837-865.

• Connell, R.W. (2000). The Men and the Boys. Cambridge: Polity Press.

• Conway, J. (2004). Men: what are they really thinking? Admap, 455(November 2004), 36-38.

• Copeland, G.A. (1989). Face-ism and primetime television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 33(2), 209-214.

• Cortese, A.J.P. (1999). Provocateur: Images of Women and Minorities in Advertising. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

• Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1990), The past explains the present, Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(11), 375-424.

• Courtney, A.E. & Lockeretz, S.W. (1971). A women’s place: An analysis of the roles portrayed by women in magazine advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 92-95.

• Cowlett, M. (2000). How to best target active young men. Marketing, 18 mei 2000, 37-38.

• Craig, R.S. (1992). The effect of television day part on gender portrayals in television commercials : A content analysis, Sex Roles, 26,197-211.

• Craig, R.S. (1993). Selling Masculinities, Selling Femininities: Multiple genders and the economics of television. The Mid-Atlantic Almanack, 2, 15-27.

• Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock: Altruism and sexual selection from Darwin to today. New York: Cambridge University Press.

• Croteau, D. & Hoynes, W. (1992). Men and the News Media. In Craig, S. (Ed.), Men, Masculinity and the Media (p. 154-167). London: Sage Publications.

• Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: Murray.

• Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.

• Day, J. (2000). Toiletry Purchasing Trends. Marketing Week, 23(23), p.36.

• Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Touchstone.

• De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M. & Van den Bergh, J. (2001). Marketing Communications. Financial Times: Prentice Hall.

• Diekman, A.B. & Eagly, A.H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: women and men of the past, present and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171-1188.

• Dingena, M. (1994). Betekeniscreatie in reclame: interactie van figuratieve reclame en individuele verschillen in stijl van informatieverwerking. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

• Donald, R.R. (1992). Masculinity and Machismo in Hollywood’s War Films. In S. Craig (Ed.), Men, Masculinity, and the Media (p. 124-136). London: Sage Publications.

• Donoghue, L. (2005). Men choose science or simplicity? Global Cosmetic Industry, 173(9), 30-32.

• Dow, B.J. (2001). Ellen, Television, and the Politics of Gay and Lesbian Visibility. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18(2), 123-140.

• Downs, A.C. (1981). Sex-role stereotyping on prime-time television. The journal of genetic psychology, 138, 253-258.

• Downs, A.C. & Gowan, D.C. (1980). Sex differences in reinforcement and punishment on prime-time television. Sex Roles, 6(5), 683-694.

• Durkin, K. (1985). Television and sex-role acquisition 1: Content. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 101-113.

• De Clercq, W. (2003). Stereotypes in reclame: impliciete attitudes ten opzichte van de nieuwe man. Ongepubliceerde scriptie, Ugent.

• Demoor, M. & Longman, C. (2000). Inleiding: Wat is gender? Wat zijn gendestudies? In: Inleiding tot de genderstudies I, p. 1-17. Gent: Academia Press.

• De Waal, F.B.M. (2002). Evolutionary Psychology: The Wheat and the Chaff. Current directions in psychological science, 11(6), 187-191.

• Durkheim, E. (1964) (1895). The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.

• Dyer, G. (1987). ‘Introduction’, in Baehr, Helen and Dyer, Gillian (eds), Boxed In: Women and Television. London: Pandora.

• Eagly, A.H. & Steffen, V.J. (1984). Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men Into Social Roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735-754.

• Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: a social role interpretation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

• Eagly, A.H. (1997). Sex differences in social behaviour: comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

• Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S.L. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

• Eagly, A.H. & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behaviour: evolved dispositions versus social roles. American psychologist, 54(6), 408-423.

• Edens, K.M. & McCormick, C.B. (2000). How do adolescents process advertising? The influence of ad characteristics, processing objective, and gender. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(4), 450-463.

• Elasmar, M., Hasegawa, K. & Brain, M. (1999). The portrayal of women in US prime time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44(1), 20-34.

• England, P. & Gardner, T. (1983). Sex differentiation in magazine advertisements: A content analysis using log-linear modelling. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 6(1), 253-268.

• Evans, D. & Zarate, O. (1999). Introducing Evolutionary Psychology. Cambridge: Icon Books Ltd.

• Falconnet, G. & Lefaucheur, N. (1975). La fabrication des mâles. Paris: Seuil.

• Farnham, A. (1996). You’re so vain – I bet you think this story’s about you. Fortune, 134(5), 66-75.

• Fejes, F.J. (1992). Masculinity as a fact : A review of empirical mass communication research on masculinity. In S. Craig (Ed.), Men, Masculinity and the Media, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

• Felski, R. (2000). Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture. New York: New York University Press.

• Femiano, S. & Nickerson, M. (1989). How do Media Images of Men Affect Our Lives? Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.medialit.org/reading_room/article39.html .

• Fisher, H. (2000). De eerste sekse. Over de eigenschappen van vrouwen. Amsterdam: contact.

• Fiske, J. (1987). Television Culture. London: Methuen.

• Fiske, J. (1989a). Understanding Popular Culture. London: Unwin Huyman.

• Fiske, J. (1989b). Reading the Popular. London: Unwin Huyman.

• Ford, J. (2005). Mr. Contrary: meeting needs and creating desires for today’s contradictory male. Voorstelling op de In-Cosmetics beurs 2005 te Parijs. Geraadpleegd op het World Wide Web op 26 juli 2005: http://www.in-cosmetics.com/files/incosmetics05_Pearlfisher.pdf.

• Ford, J.B, Kramer Voli, P., Honeycutt, E.D., Casey, S.L. (2001). Gender Role Portrayals in Japanese Advertising: A magazine content analysis. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 113-124.

• Foucault, M. (1977). Histoire de la sexualité, 1: La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.

• Foucault, M. & Rabinow, P. (1991). The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin Books.

• Fowles, J. (1996). Advertising and popular culture, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

• Franklin, C.W. II. (1986). The Changing Definition of Masculinity. New York: Plenum Press.

• Franklin, C.W. II. (1988). Men and Society. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

• Furnham, A., Babitzkow, M. & Uguccioni, S. (2000). Gender stereotyping in television advertisement: A study of French and Danish Television. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(1), 79-104.

• Furnham, A. & Mak, T. (1999). Sex-Role Stereotyping in Television Commercials: A Review and Comparison of Fourteen Studies Done on Five Continents Over 25 Years. Sex Roles, 41(5/6), 413-437.

• Garst, J. & Bodenhausen, G.V. (1997). Advertising’s effects on men’s gender role attitudes. Sex Roles, 36(9/10), 551-572.

• Gauntlett, D. (1995). Moving Experiences. Understanding Television’s Influences and Effects. London: John Libbey.

• Gauntlett, D. (2002). Media, Gender and Identity. An Introduction. London: Routledge.

• Geary, D.C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition: Implications for development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50, 24-37.

• Gecas, V. (1981). Rethinking Socialization. Contemporary Sociology, 10(5), 642-644.

• Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1980). ‘Charting the mainstream’: Television’s contribution to political orientations’. Journal of communication, 30(1), 10-29.

• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.

• Giddens, A. & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

• Gill, S., Stockard, J., Johnson, M. & William, S. (1987). Measuring gender differences: the expressive dimension and critique of androgyny scales. Sex Roles, 17(7/8), 375-400.

• Gilly, M.C. (1988). Sex Roles in Advertising: A Comparison of Television Advertisements in Australia, Mexico, and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 75-85.

• Goffman, E. (1976). Gender Advertisements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.

• Goldman, R. (1992). Reading Ads Socially. London: Routledge.

• Grbich, C. (1990). Socialisation and social change: A critique of three positions. The British Journal of Sociology, 41(4), 517-530.

• Greenberg, B.S. (1980). Life on television : content analyses of U.S. TV drama. Norwood (N.J.) : Ablex.

• Gross, L. (1989). Out of the mainstream sexual minorities and the mass media. In E. Seiter, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner & E. Worth (Eds.), Remote control: Television, audiences and cultural power (p. 130-149). London: Routledge.

• Gunter, B. (1995). Television and gender representation. London : Libbey.

• Hall, B.F. (2002). A New Model for Measuring Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 23(1), 23-31.

• Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.

• Hantula, D.A. (2003). Guest Editorial: Evolutionary Psychology and Consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 20(9): 757-763.

• Haslam, S.A., Brooks, L. & Oakes, P.J. (1993). Stereotype validity: A question of content or context? Paper presented at the General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Psychology, Lisbon, Sept.

• Heerboth, J.R. & Ramanaiah, N.V. (1985). Evaluation of the BSRI Masculine and Feminine Items Using Desirability and Stereotype Ratings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(3), 264-270.

• Hiller, D.V. & Philliber, W.W. (1985). Internal Consistency and Correlates of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(4), 373-380.

• Hoffman, R.M. & Borders, L.D. ( april 2001). Twenty-Five Years After the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A Reassessment and New Issues Regarding Classification Variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39-55.

• Hollows, J. (2003). Oliver’s twist: Leisure, labour and domestic masculinity in The Naked Chef. International journal of cultural studies, 6(2), 229-248.

• Horowitz, I.L. (Ed.) (1963), Power, politics, and people: The collected essays of C. Wright Mills. New York: Ballantine.

• Hrdy, S.B. (1999). The Woman that Never Evolved. Cambridge (Mass.) : Harvard university press.

• Jeffords, S. (1993). ‘Can Masculinity be terminated?’ In Cohan, S. & Hark, I.R. (Eds.), Screening the Male: Exploring Masculinities in Hollywood Cinema. London: Routledge.

• Johnson, F.L. & Young, K. (2002). Gendered Voices in Children’s Television Advertising. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(4), 461-480.

• Kaufman, G. (1999). The portrayal of men’s family roles in television commercials. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, Sept 1999.

• Kimball, M. (1986). Television and sex-role attitudes. In T.M. Williams (Ed.)., The Impact of Television, London: Academic Press.

• Kimmel, M. (1987). Rethinking ‘masculinity’: New directions in research. In M.S. Kimmel (Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (p. 9-24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

• Klassen, M.L., Jasper, C.R. & Schwartz, A.M. (1993). Men and women: images of their relationships in magazine advertisements. Journal of advertising research, march/april 1993, 30-39.

• Klein, N. (2000). No Logo. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.

• Knight, J. (2002). Sexual stereotypes. Nature, 415(17/01/02), p.254-256.

• Kolbe, R.H. & Albanese, P.J. (1996), Man to man: A content analysis of sole-man images in male-audience magazines, Journal of Advertising, 25(4), 1-20.

• Kring, A.M. & Gordon, A.H. (1998). Sex Differences in Emotion: Expression, Experience, and Physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 686-703.

• Lauzen, M.M. & Dozier, D.M. (1999). Making a difference in prime time: women on screen and behind the scenes in the 1995-1996 television season. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(1), 1-19.

• Lazier-Smith, L. (1989). Advertising: Women’s place and image. In P.J. Creedon (Ed.), Women in mass communication: Challenging gender values, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

• Lempert, P. (2004). Metrosexuals at the market. Progressive Grocer, 83(12), p.16.

• Lippman, W. (1922). Public Opinion. NY: Harcourt Brace.

• Lovdal, L. T. (1989). ‘Sex Role Messages in Television Commercials: An Update. Sex Roles, 21 (11/12) 715-721.

• Luebke, B. (1989). Out of focus; images of women and men in newspaper photographs. Sex Roles, 20(3/4), 121-133.

• Lueptow, L.B. & Garovich, L. (1995). The Persistence of Gender Stereotypes in the Face of Changing Sex Roles: Evidence Contrary to the Sociocultural Model. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16: 509-530.

• Lueptow, L.B., Garovich, L. & Lueptow, M.B. (2001). Social Change and the Persistence of Sex Typing: 1974-1997. Social Forces, 80(1), 1-36.

• Lysonski, S. (1985). Role portrayals in British magazine advertisements. European Journal of Marketing, 19(7), 37-55.

• MacKenzie, S.B., Lutz, R.J., Belch, G.E. (1986). The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (2), 130-143.

• Macklin, M.C. & Kolbe, R.H. (1983). Sex Role stereotyping in children’s advertising: Current and past trends. Journal of Advertising, 13(2), 34-42.

• Maher, J.K. & Childs, N.M. (2003). A Longitudinal Analysis of Gender Roles in Children’s Television Advertisements: A 27 Year Review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 25(1), 71-81.

• Manca, A. & Manca, L. (1994). Gender and utopia in advertising: a critical reader. Lisle: Procopian Press.

• Marsh, H.W. (1985). The structure of masculinity/femininity: An application of confirmatory factor analysis to higher-order factor structures and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20(4), 427-449.

• Marsh, H.W., Antill, J.K. & Cunningham, J.D. (1989). Masculinity and femininity: A bipolar construct and independent constructs. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 625-663.

• Mason, S. (2002). Marketing to Men. Global Cosmetic Industry, 170(3), 26-30.

• Massé, M. & Rosenblum, K. (1988). Male and female created they them : The depiction of gender in advertising of traditional women’s and men’s magazines. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(2), 127-144.

• Matthews, I. (2005). How Men Catch On to Cosmetics. Global Cosmetic Industry, 173(2), p.38-40.

• McArthur, L.Z. & Resko, B.G. (1975). The portrayal of men and women in American television commercials. The Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 209-220.

• McGivern, R.F., Mutter, K.L., Anderson, J., Wideman, G., Bodnar, M. & Huston, P.J. (1998). Sex differences in visual recognition memory: support for a sex-related difference in attention in adults and children. Brain and cognition, 34(3), 323-336.

• McKee, A. (2002). Images of gay men in the media and the development of self esteem. Australian journal of communication, 18(2), 123-140.

• Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

• Mealy, M. (2000). Sex differences: developmental and evolutionary strategies. San Diego: Academic Press.

• Meet the metrosexual (22 juli 2002). He's well dressed, narcissistic and obsessed with butts. But don't call him gay. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2002/07/22/metrosexual/index.html?pn=1.

• Mellen, J. (1977). Big bad wolves: Masculinity in the American film. New York: Pantheon.

• Mercola, J. (2004). ‘Ideal’ Body Images in Media Affect Men Too. Geraadpleegd op 5 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.mercola.com/2004/may/8/ideal_body.htm .

• Messner, M. (1987). Male identity in the life course of the jock. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), Changing Men (p. 53-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

• Messner, M.A. (1993). ‘Changing Men’ and Feminist Politics in the United States. Theory and Society, 22(5), 723-737.

• Messner, M. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. California: Sage.

• Metrosexual (18 juli 2006). Geraadpleegd op 18 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrosexual .

• Metrosexual Man Embraces Feminism – UK (16 juni 2003). A new study from Euro RSCG Worldwide Examines the Attitudes and Ambitions of 21st Century Man. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.eurorsg.com/press/press_203.htm.

• Metrosexuals: The Future of Men? – US (22 juni 2003). A new study from Euro RSCG Worldwide Examines the Attitudes and Ambitions of 21st Century Man. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.eurorscg.com/press/press_204.htm .

• Meyer, M.D.E. & Kelley, J.M. (2004). Queering the Eye? The politics of gay white men and gender (in)visibility. Feminist Media Studies, 4(2), 214-217.

• Meyers-Levy, J. (1988). The influence of sex roles on judgment. Journal of consumer research, 14(4), 522-530.

• Meyers-Levy, J. (1998). Mixed messages: how men and women differ in their response to advertising. Geraadpleegd op 5 juli 2006 op het world wide web: http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/news/capideas/sum98/meyers.htm .

• Meyers-Levy, J. & Maheswaran, D. (1991). Exploring Differences in Males’ and Females’ Processing Strategies. Journal of consumer research, 18(1), 63-70.

• Michell, P.C.N. & Taylor, W. (1989). Polarising Trends in Female Role Portrayals in UK Advertising. European Journal of Marketing, 24 (5), 41-49.

• Moore, C. (2006). Elaboration Likelihood Model. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.ciadvertising.org/student_account/fall_01/adv382j/cmoore/elaboration_likelihood_model.htm

• Morgan, M. (1987). Television, sex-role attitudes and sex-role behaviour. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7(3), 269-282.

• Morrison, M.M. (2003). Gender-role congruence and self-referencing as determinants of advertising effectiveness. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 49 (5-6), 265-275.

• Mort, F. (1988). Boy’s own? Masculinity, Style and Popular Culture. In R. Chapman & J. Rutherford (Eds), Male Order. Unwrapping Masculinity. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

• Mortelmans, D. (1997). Evoluties van sekserollen in Vlaamse magazinereclame, Stereotyperingen van mannen en vrouwen tussen 1970 en 1994. Communicatie, 26(3), 20-42.

• Moss, G. (1999). Gender and consumer behavior: further explanations. The Journal of brand management, 7(2), 88-99.

• Moss, G. & Colman, A.M. (2001). Choices and preferences: Experiments on gender differences. Brand Management, 9(2), 89-99.

• Murray, S. (2005). Masculinity vs femininity. Stirling Murray considers the art of communication to men and women. Soap, perfumery & cosmetics, 78(6), 15-16.

• Nieuwe Man bestaat niet. (2006, 26 januari). Geraadpleegd op 17 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_163275.html.

• O’Neil, J.M., Helms, B.J., Gable, R.K., David, L. & Wrightsman, L.S. (1986). Gender role conflict scale: College men’s fear of femininity. Sex Roles, 14, 335-350.

• Orth, U.R. & Holancova, D. (2003). Consumer response to sex role portrayals in advertisements. Effects of Incongruity and prejudices on emotions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 77-89.

• Otnes, C. & McGrath, M.A. (2001). Perceptions and realities of male shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 111-137.

• Ozkan, T. & Lajunen, T. (2005). Masculinity, femininity, and the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Turkey. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 52 (1-2), 103-110.

• Parke, R.D. & Stearns, P.N. (1993). Fathers and child rearing. In G.H. Elder, J. Modell & R.D. Parke (Eds.), Children in time and place (p. 147-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Parsons, T. & Shils, E.A. (Eds.) (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

• Parry, C. (2005). Reaching the feminine side of men. Marketing week, 27 januari 2005, p. 38.

• Pauli, L. (29 december 2003). Metrosexuality: It’s all about ‘me’. Geraadpleegd op 2 mei 2005 op het World Wide Web: http://www.vibewire.net/articles.php?id=2212 .

• Pedhazur, E.J. & Tetenbaum, T.J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996-1016.

• Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

• Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.

• Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. (1992). Natural language and natural selection. In J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (451-493). London: Oxford University Press. 

• Poels, K. & Dewitte, S. (2006). When Gender Identity Moderates Men’s and Women’s Preferences for Sex Specific Advertising Pictures (and When it Does Not). Unpublished working paper.

• Powell, M. & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605-628.

• Potter, W. & Ware, W. (1987). Traits of perpetrators and receivers of antisocial and prosocial acts on TV. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 382-391.

• Prentice, D.A. & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: the contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of women quarterly, 26, 269-281.

• Putrevu, S. (2004). Communicating with the sexes. Male and female responses to print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 51-62.

• Reed-Sanders, D., Dodder, R.A. & Webster, L. (1985). The Bem Sex Role Inventory Across Three Cultures. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(4), 523-525.

• Real men get waxed (7/5/2003). A new male market emerges. Economist; 7/5/2003, 368(8331), p. 57.

• Riffe, D., Place, P.C. & Mayo, C.M. (1993). Game time, soap time and prime time TV ads: Treatment of women on Sunday football and rest-of-week advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 437-446.

• Roediger, H.L., Capaldi, E.D., Paris, S.G., Polivy, J. & Herman, C.P. (1996). Psychologie. Een Inleiding. Gent: Academia Press.

• Rohlinger, D.A. (2002), Eroticizing men: cultural influences on advertising and male objectification, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 46(3/4), 61-74.

• Ruch, L.O. (1984). Dimensionality of the Bem Sex Role inventory: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 10, 99-117.

• Rudman, L.A. & Kilianski, S.E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1315-1328.

• Saad, G. & Gill, T. (2000). Applications of Evolutionary Psychology in Marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(12), 1005-1034.

• Saeys, F. (2000). Gender en media, In: Inleiding tot de genderstudies I, Gent: Academia Press.

• Salzman, M., Matathia, I. & O’Reilly, A. (2005). The Future of Men. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

• Schaller, M. (1997). Beyond competing, beyond compatible. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1379-1380.

• Schiering, M. (2003). Red Carpet BRANDING. Brandweek, 44(33), 28-30.

• Schneider, K.C. & Schneider, B.S. (1979). Trends in Sex Roles in Television Commercials. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 79-84.

• Scott, L.M. (1994). Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252-273.

• Seely, P. (1994). The mirror and the window of the man of the nineties. Portrayals of males in television advertising. In: Manca, A. & Manca, L. (93-108), Gender and utopia in advertising: a critical reader. Lisle: Procopian Press.

• Segal, L. (1993). Changing Men: Masculinities in Context. Theory and Society, 22(5), 625-641.

• Seidler, V.J. (1994). Unreasonable men: masculinity and social theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

• Seiter, E. (1986). Stereotypes and the media: A re-evaluation. Journal of communication, 36(2), 14-26.

• Sekse (2 mei 2006). Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sekse .

• Shugart, H.A., (2003). Reinventing Privilege: The New (Gay) Man in Contemporary Popular Media. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(1), p.67-91.

• Signorielli, N. (1982). Marital status in television drama: A case of reduced options. Journal of broadcasting, 26(2), 585-597.

• Simpson, M. (1994). (15 november 1994). ‘Here come the mirror men’. The Independent (London), p.22.

• Silverman, I. & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 533 – 549). New York: Oxford University Press.

• Smelik, A., Buikema, R. & Meijer, M. (1999). Effectief beeldvormen: theorie, analyse, en praktijk van beeldvormingsprocessen. Assen: Van Gorcum.

• Soley, L. & Kurzbard, G. (1986). Sex in Advertising: A comparison of 1964 and 1984 magazine advertisements. Journal of advertising, 15(3), 46-64.

• Solley, S. (2004). EasyGroup moves into male toiletries. Marketing, 25 maart 2004, 1.

• Solomon, M.R. (1996). Consumer behavior : buying, having and being. London : Prentice-Hall International.

• Sorting the men from the boys (December 2002). Soap, perfumery & cosmetics, 75(12), 14-17.

• Spangler, L.C. (1992). Buddies and Pals. A history of male friendships on prime-time television. In S. Craig (Ed.), Men, Masculinity and the Media (p. 93-110). London: Sage Publications.

• Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R.L. & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity and theory relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(16), 73-82.

• Spence, J.T. & Buckner, C.E. (2000). Instrumental and Expressive Traits, Trait Stereotypes, and Sexist Attitudes. What Do They Signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.

• St. John, W. (21 juni 2003). Metrosexuals come out. Geraadpleegd op 26 juli 2006 op het World Wide Web: http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2003/06/21/metrosexuals.html .

• Staats, A.W. (1991). Unified positivism and unification psychology: Fad or new field? American Psychologist, 46, 899-912.

• Stangor, C. & Lange, J. (1994). Mental representations of social groups: Advances in understanding stereotypes and stereotyping. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 357-416.

• Sternglanz, S. & Serbin, L. (1974). Sex role stereotyping in children’s television programs. Developmental Psychology, 10(5), 710-715.

• Strinati, D. (1995). An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture, London: Routledge.

• Sturrock, F. & Pioch, E. (1998). Making himself attractive: the growing consumption of grooming products. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 16(5), 337-345.

• Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

• Tartour, M. (1997). Qu’est-ce que ça sent un homme? Nos amis les hommes, 120-123.

• Tenerelli, M.J. (2001). Men’s Skin Care 2001. Global Cosmetic Industry, 168(3), 22-32.

• Tuchman, G., Daniels, A. & Benet, J. (Eds.) (1978). Hearth and home: Images of women in mass media. New York: Oxford University Press.

• Vandersmissen, M. (2001, 20 april). Nieuwe man bestaat niet. De Standaard: 1-3.

• Van Raaij, F. (1989). How consumers react to advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 8(3), 261-273.

• Vigorito, A.J. & Curry, T.J. (1998). Marketing Masculinity: Gender Identity and Popular Magazines. Sex Roles, 39(1/2), 135-152.

• Vincke, J. (2000). Sociologie. Een klassieke en hedendaagse benadering. Gent: Academia Press.

• Visser, I. (2002). Prototypes of gender: conceptions of feminine and masculine, Women’s Studies International Forum, 25(5), 529-539.

• Vogel, D.L., Wester, S.R., Heesacker, M. & Madon, S. (2003). Confirming Gender Stereotypes: A Social Role Perspective. Sex Roles, 48(11/12), 519-528.

• Vyncke, P. (2003). Communicatiemanagement 1. Cursus academiejaar 2003-2004.

• Vyncke, P. & Poels, K. (2003). De cruciale rol van emoties bij reclameverwerking. In R. Duyck & C. Van Tilborgh (Eds.), Management Jaarboek 2003 (p.148-153). Antwerpen: Rik Duyck.

• Wagner, L. & Banos, J.B. (1973). A woman’s place: a follow-up analysis of the roles portrayed by women on magazine advertisements. Journal of marketing research, 10(2),

• Wanta, W. & Leggett, D. (1989). Gender stereotypes in wire service sports photos. Newspaper Research Journal, 10(3), 105-114.

• Watts, R.H. & Borders, L.D. (2005). Boys’ perceptions of the male role: understanding gender role conflict in adolescent males. The Journal of men’s studies, 13(2), 267-280.

• Wentworth, W.M. (1980). Context and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Socialization Theory. NY: Elsevier.

• What’s Hot Around the Globe – Insights on Growth in Personal Care (mei 2004). Geraadpleegd op het World Wide Web op 26 juli 2006: http://www2.acnielsen.com/reports/documents/2004_whatshot.pdf .

• Whelan, D. (2001). Men, their motives and their magazines. American Demographics, 23(10), 18-20.

• Whetton, C. & Swindells, T. (1977). A factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 150-153.

• “Who’s wearing the trousers?” (8 september 2001). The Economist, p.26-28.

• Wiles, J.A. & Wiles, C.R. (1995). A comparison of gender role portrayals in magazine advertising. The Netherlands, Sweden and the USA. European Journal of Marketing, 29(11), 35-49.

• Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 

• Williams, J.E. & Best, D.L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

• With metrosexuals in mid-America, merchants explore ‘masculine side’ (21 juni 2004). Drug Store News, 26(8), p. 63, 72, 74.

• Wolheter, M. & Lammers, B. (1980). An analysis of male roles in print advertisements over a 20-year span: 1958-1978. Advances in Consumer Research, vol. VII.

• Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1-27.