Assessing the
strength and capacity
of political and civil service systems
in Central and
Eastern Europe.
The case of the Hungarian Ministry of Agriculture.
R.H.A.M. Knubben
Faculty of Social Sciences,
European Master of Public Administration
Catholic University of Leuven
August 10th, 2003
Promoter : Prof. L. van Depoele
home | lijst scripties | contence | next |
CH #1, The framework
§1.1 Background
§1.2 Benchmarks
§1.3 Introducing the model
§1.4 Integration
§1.5 Theoretical grounding
CH #2, Ministerial capacity
§2.1 (1) Historical development & loyalty
§2.2 (2) Organizational structure
§2.3 (3) Effective policy-making
§2.3.1 (3) Background
§2.3.2 (3) 90’s to the present
§2.3.3 (3) CMOs
§2.3.4 (3) Land reforms
§2.3.5 (3) SAPARD & AIC
§2.3.6 (3) AIC revisited
§2.3.7 (3) European Agricultural Guarantee and Guidance Fund Paying Agency
§2.3.8 (3) Other departments
§2.3.9 (3) EMS
§2.3.10 (3) The Commission’s evaluation
§2.4 (4) Tradition & culture
§2.5 (5) Prestige, staffing & funding
§2.6 (6) Degree of polarization
§2.7 (7) Corruption externalities
§2.7.1 (7) Background
§2.7.2 (7) At present
§2.7.3 (7) Cost benefit analysis
§2.8 (8) External influence factors
CH #3, Political capacity
§3.1 (1) Degree of polarization
§3.2 (2) Strong leadership
§3.3 (3) Nat. identity & cultural awareness
§3.3.1 (3) Theory
§3.3.2 (3) The Baltics
CH #4, Structural & Assessment factors
§4.1 (1) Power of judiciary
§4.2 (2) Public scrutiny
§4.2.1 (2) Historical background
§4.2.2 (2) 90’s up to the present
§4.3 (3) Resourcefulness
§4.4 (x) Assessment indicators
§4.4.1 (x) Introduction
§4.4.2 (x) Economic indicators
§4.4.3 (x) Non economic indicators
CH#5, Conclusion
home | lijst scripties | contence | next |